Valmari Frank v. Robert Larson
Chrysler-Plymouth: Represented the dealership against claims of gender
harassment and discrimination; disability discrimination and
harassment; and retaliation. The Arbitrator found in favor of our
client and granted a defense verdict.
Grounds v. Nordstrom: Represented company
against claim of sexual orientation discrimination. Jury found in
favor of our client.
Karen Holden v. Heath Tecna/Ciba Geigy
Corporation:
Represented company against claim of sexual harassment. Jury found
in favor of our client.
Goehle v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center: Represented the Cancer
Research Center against claims of age and national origin
discrimination. Jury found in favor of our client. Verdict upheld on appeal.
Faustino v. Ducky’s Inc: Represented company
against claims of assault and outrage. Jury found in favor of our
client.
Dawn Cockle v. Caterpillar, Inc.: Represented employee
against claim of sexual harassment. Jury found in favor of our
client.
Summary Judgments In Favor of Clients
Frey v. Spokane Fire District No.8: Represented
District against claims under FSLA and Washington's minimum wage act.
Summary judgment granted in favor of our client.
Schenfeld v. United Rentals: Represented company against
claim of wrongful discharge and defamation. Summary
judgment granted in favor of our client.
Valerie Arnold v. TRM
Manufacturing: Represented
company against claims of breach of contract, wrongful discharge,
intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference
with business expectancy, and negligent infliction of emotional
distress. Summary judgment granted in favor of our
client.
Alecia Benton v.
Weyerhaueser Co.,: Represented company
against claims of racial and sexual harassment, and retaliation.
Summary judgment granted in favor of our client.
Doe and Roe v.
Wilker: Represented estate against
claims of sexual abuse. Summary judgment granted in favor of our
client.
Hutchins v.
1001Fourth Avenue Association:
Represented company against claims of improper security. Summary
judgment granted in favor of our client.
Gruenhagen v. United Rentals: Represented
company in claims of defective equipment.
Summary judgment granted in favor of our client and upheld on appeal.
Recent Judgments In Favor of Clients In Agency
Hearings
Sami Saad v. American Seafoods
Company: Defended company against claims of race, national
origin and disability discrimination. The Washington State
Human Rights Commission found "No Reasonable Cause."
D'Tanyum Huey v. McDonald's: Represented
company in claim of race discrimination. Oregon's Bureau of
Labor & Industries found no cause to believe discrimination had
occurred and dismissed the complaint.
John Norbeck v. McDonald's: Represented company against claim of sexual harassment and
retaliation. The Equal Employment Opprotunity Commission found "No Cause."
Kenneth McCline v. Arby's: Represented company against claim of age and disability
discrimination. The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries
found "No Cause" and dismissed the complaint.
Milt Christophe v. Sound of Puyallup: Represented the client against claims of race
discrimination, race harassment, and retaliation. We won a “No
Reasonable
Cause” finding for our client from the Washington State Human Rights
Commission.
Charles Schickling v. McDonald's :
Plaintiff alleged that he was terminated for "Whistleblowing."
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries dismissed his charge based
on lack of evidence.
Lydia Keyes v. American Seafoods: Represented the company against claims of gender
harassment and retaliation. We won a “No Cause” finding from
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Lynn Sawatzky v. Mercedes of Tacoma: Represented the automobile dealership against claims of
gender discrimination and wrongful termination. We won a “No Cause”
finding for our client.
Griffin v. Robert Larson: Represented the dealership against claims of
race discrimination and wrongful termination. We won a “No Cause”
finding by Tacoma Human Rights Commission.
Zacher v. Landmark Theatre Group: Represented company
before the Seattle Office of Civil Rights. We won a "No Cause"
finding for our client.
Aimee Sanford v. Western Power and Equipment: Represented
company before the Alaska Human Rights Commission. We won a "No
Cause" finding for our client.
Aurea Saavedra v. ASC: Represented
the company against claims of failure to accommodate and disability
discrimination. We won a “No Cause” finding for our
client.
Miscellaneous Representative Tort
and Commercial Trials
Anthony Teuscher v. Alice
Emery: Represented defendant in case
involving accident claims. Jury found in favor of our client. Upheld on appeal.
DeLena v. Ruth’s Chris
Steakhouse: Represented company in
case involving accidental injuries. Defense verdict
granted.
Humphries v. Madsen
Electric Co., Inc.: Represented
company against claims of wrongful death. Case settled shortly
before closing arguments for an amount less than previously offered.
Mitchell v. Kockums CanCar
Corp.: Represented company against
claims of defective machinery leading to severe brain damage. Jury
apportioned fault primarily against employer of plaintiff and
plaintiff himself. Net result was de minimus verdict against our
client, which was upheld on appeal.
Leighton v.
Hagen: Represented individual in
claim involving personal injury. Jury found in favor of our client.
Olympic Cold Storage v. RSUI:
Represented property insurer in coverage action stemming from an insured's
intentional power shut-off of cold storage refrigeration.
Shortly before the case went to the jury, the plaintiffs agreed to settle for
an amount less than previously offered.